@article{94418,
  keywords = {Systematic reviews},
  author = {Tugwell P and Welch V and Karunananthan S and Maxwell LJ and Akl EA and Avey MT and Bhutta ZA and Brouwers MC and Clark JP and Cook S and Cuervo LG and Curran JA and Ghogomu ET and Graham IG and Grimshaw JM and Hutton B and Ioannidis JP and Jordan Z and Jull JE and Kristjansson E and Langlois EV and Little J and Lyddiatt A and Martin JE and Marušić A and Mbuagbaw L and Moher D and Morton RL and Nasser M and Page MJ and Pardo Pardo J and Petkovic J and Petticrew M and Pigott T and Pottie K and Rada G and Rader T and Riddle AY and Rothstein H and Schüneman H and Shamseer L and Shea BJ and Simeon R and Siontis KC and Smith M and Soares-Weiser K and Thavorn K and Tovey D and Vachon B and Valentine J and Villemaire R and Walker P and Weeks L and Wells G and Wilson DB and White H},
  title = {When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist},
  abstract = {Replication is an essential part of the scientific method, yet replication of systematic reviews is too often overlooked, and done unnecessarily or poorly. Excessive replication (doing the same study repeatedly) is unethical and a cause of research wastage. This article provides consensus based guidance on when to replicate and not replicate systematic reviews.},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {BMJ},
  pages = {m2864},
  publisher = {BMJ},
  issn = {1756-1833},
  url = {https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/370/bmj.m2864.full.pdf},
  doi = {10.1136/bmj.m2864},
  language = {eng},
}