@article{98496, keywords = {Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health policy, Scale-up, Sustainability, Social innovation, narrative review, Global health, Systems thinking}, author = {Niang M and Alami H and Gagnon M and Dupéré S}, title = {A conceptualisation of scale-up and sustainability of social innovations in global health: a narrative review and integrative framework for action}, abstract = {
Background: The scale-up and sustainability of social innovations for health have received increased interest in global health research in recent years; however, these ambiguous concepts are poorly defined and insufficiently theorised and studied. Researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners lack conceptual clarity and integrated frameworks for the scale-up and sustainability of global health innovations. Often, the frameworks developed are con-ceived in a linear and deterministic or consequentialist vision of the diffusion of innovations. This approach limits the consideration of complexity in scaling up and sustaining innovations.
Objective: By using a systems theory lens and conducting a narrative review, this manuscript aims to produce an evidence-based integrative conceptual framework for the scale-up and sustainability of global health innovations.
Method: We conducted a hermeneutic narrative review to synthetise different definitions of scale-up and sustainability to model an integrative definition of these concepts for global health. We have summarised the literature on the determinants that influence the conditions for innovation success or failure while noting the interconnections between internal and external innovation environments.
Results: The internal innovation environment includes innovation characteristics (effective-ness and testability, monitoring and evaluation systems, simplification processes, resource requirements) and organisational characteristics (leadership and governance, organisational change, and organisational viability). The external innovation environment refers to receptive and transformative environments; the values, cultures, norms, and practices of individuals, communities, organisations, and systems; and other contextual characteristics relevant to innovation development.
Conclusion: From these syntheses, we proposed an interconnected framework for action to better guide innovation researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in incorporating com-plexity and systemic interactions between internal and external innovation environments in global health
}, year = {2023}, journal = {Global Health Action}, volume = {16}, pages = {1-18}, publisher = {Informa UK Limited}, issn = {1654-9716, 1654-9880}, url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/16549716.2023.2230813?needAccess=true&role=button}, doi = {10.1080/16549716.2023.2230813}, language = {Eng}, }