03632nas a2200385   4500000000100000008004100001260003700042653002500079653001400104653002900118653004200147100001100189700001500200700001300215700001500228700001300243700001300256700001300269700001400282700001200296700001600308700001100324700001300335700001200348700001600360700002000376700001500396700001400411245014900425856009900574300000900673490000700682520254300689022001403232       2025                            d  bPublic Library of Science (PLoS)10aSnakebite management10asnakebite10aHealthcare professionals10aHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice1 aAga AM1 aMulugeta D1 aMotuma A1 aWakitole B1 aMuleta D1 aFerede H1 aTeferi Z1 aTadesse S1 aAbebe T1 aAlemayehu F1 aDube D1 aOljira S1 aAlemu A1 aGebrewold G1 aWoldemariyam FT1 aNigussie D1 aSartim MA00aHealth professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices in snakebite management: A study from high-burden areas in the Afar Region, Ethiopia  uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0013713&type=printable  a1-110 v193 a<p><strong>Background:</strong></p>

<p>Snakebite envenoming remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in rural and resource-limited tropical regions such as sub-Saharan Africa. In Ethiopia, the Afar Region bears a disproportionate burden due to environmental exposure, pastoralist livelihoods, and limited access to timely medical care. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP), and capacity gaps among healthcare professionals in selected snakebite hotspot areas of the Afar Region.</p>

<p><strong>Methods:</strong></p>

<p>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in five hospitals across snakebite hotspot areas in Afar. A purposive sample of 141 healthcare professionals selected, including nurses, doctors, and other clinical staff. Data were collected using structured questionnaires addressing knowledge of envenoming, antivenom use, clinical management protocols, and facility readiness.</p>

<p><strong>Results:</strong></p>

<p>Among the healthcare professionals surveyed, nurses comprised the largest group (61%), followed by medical doctors (30.5%), with the majority of respondents (54.6%) having less than three years of professional experience. Despite their frontline role, only 1.4% of participants had received specific training related to snakebite management, while 48.9% expressed need for such training. Antivenom unavailability reported by 56% of respondents indicating high cost (17%) and frequent shortages (25.5%) as key barriers to access. Standardized clinical protocols and post-discharge follow-up practices were lacking, with 61% of care providers reporting patients did not receive any follow-up care. Snakebite cases were regularly encountered, with 36.2% of respondents indicating monthly cases and 31.2% weekly. Although antivenom was the primary first-line treatment (60.3%), the use of diagnostic methods to support case identification was not available.</p>

<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p>

<p>This study highlights critical deficiencies in healthcare provider training, clinical capacity, and practical experience for effective snakebite case management. Addressing these gaps requires urgent implementation of targeted training programs, development of standardized treatment protocols, and reinforcement of antivenom supply systems. Integrating snakebite management into medical and health science curricula is essential to build sustainable clinical competency and enhance patient outcomes in high-burden settings.</p>
  a1935-2735