05133nas a2200565 4500000000100000008004100001260001200042653001700054653002900071653002300100653001600123653001300139653004000152100001100192700001700203700001600220700001500236700001000251700001400261700001100275700001400286700001100300700001200311700001200323700001500335700001400350700001200364700001300376700001200389700001400401700001200415700001800427700001300445700001800458700001500476700001400491700001300505700001500518700001600533700001400549700001200563700001200575700001400587700001300601245019700614856007500811300001100886520365600897022001404553 2026 d c03/202610aAzithromycin10aMass drug administration10aFacial cleanliness10afly control10aTrachoma10acluster-randomised controlled trial1 aLast A1 aAbdurahman O1 aGreenland K1 aRobinson A1 aEtu E1 aButcher R1 aGuye M1 aLegesse D1 aNuri K1 aShuka G1 aYusuf M1 aDheressa G1 aDumessa G1 aAbera H1 aBekele M1 aAkalu M1 aTadesse M1 aKumsa D1 aGebretsadik F1 aCollin C1 aCzerniewska A1 aVersteeg B1 aHabtamu E1 aDodson S1 aAbashawl A1 aAlemayehu W1 aSolomon A1 aWeiss H1 aLogan J1 aMacleod D1 aBurton M00aDouble-dose azithromycin mass drug administration, facial cleanliness, and fly control measures for trachoma control in Oromia, Ethiopia (Stronger SAFE): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. uhttps://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1473-3099%2826%2900024-1 a1 - 123 a

BACKGROUND:

Trachoma is caused by the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis. WHO recommends the SAFE strategy for trachoma elimination: surgery for trichiasis (S), antibiotics (A), facial cleanliness (F), and environmental improvement (E). Multiple rounds of SAFE implementation have proven insufficient to eliminate trachoma in Ethiopia, where over 50% of the global trachoma burden remains. We aimed to evaluate a package of interventions to reduce the prevalence of conjunctival C trachomatis and accelerate trachoma elimination.

METHODS:

Stronger SAFE was an open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial done in rural communities in the trachoma-endemic region of Oromia, Ethiopia. Clusters, each of about 90 households, were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using Stata 17 to: (1) standard A plus standard F and E (Standard SAFE; control group), (2) standard A plus enhanced F and E, (3) enhanced A plus standard F and E, or (4) enhanced A plus enhanced F and E (Stronger SAFE group). Standard A consisted of annual, single-dose, mass drug administration (MDA) of azithromycin. Enhanced A included two height-based doses of oral azithromycin (equivalent to 20 mg/kg) given as single doses in two MDA campaigns, 2 weeks apart, annually. Standard F and E involved promotion of latrine construction and facial hygiene, whereas enhanced F and E used additional fly control measures (permethrin-treated headwear [PTH] and odour-baited traps) and a household-level, facial hygiene behaviour change intervention. The interventions were implemented and reinforced over 3 years. Laboratory technicians and the trial statistician were masked. The primary outcome was the prevalence of conjunctival C trachomatis by quantitative PCR at 3 years in the control group versus the Stronger SAFE group, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis in a cross-sectional sample of 60 children aged 1-9 years from each cluster. Adverse events were monitored in all participants receiving MDA and/or PTH. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN40760473) and is complete.

FINDINGS:

Between March 6, 2021, and Aug 31, 2024, 68 clusters were enrolled and randomly assigned to an intervention. From these clusters we surveyed 4419 children aged 1-9 years at baseline (control group n=1095; Stronger SAFE group n=1203) and 3480 (mean 50·7 [SD 9·9] per cluster) at endline (control group n=970; Stronger SAFE group n=862). At baseline, the cluster mean prevalence of conjunctival C trachomatis was 14·6% (15·5) in the control group and 13·3% (11·8) in the Stronger SAFE group. Following 3 years of intervention, the cluster-adjusted prevalence of conjunctival C trachomatis was 2·7% (95% CI 1·3-5·0) in the control group and 2·2% (0·6-7·9) in the Stronger SAFE group (adjusted prevalence difference of -0·02% [-2·73 to 2·68], p=0·99). Azithromycin was well tolerated with only 13 mild, self-limiting adverse events (almost exclusively nausea, diarrhoea, and headache) reported related to the MDA (eight in single-dose MDA communities and five in double-dose MDA communities). No serious adverse events were reported.

INTERPRETATION:

Enhanced A, F, and E (Stronger SAFE) had no additional effect compared with standard of care on reducing the prevalence of conjunctival C trachomatis at 3 years in this setting. It is therefore unlikely that these enhanced intervention measures will accelerate trachoma elimination beyond well implemented, high coverage of single-dose MDA as part of standard SAFE.

 

 a1474-4457