03210nas a2200265 4500000000100000008004100001653003900042653003000081653001600111653001700127100001300144700001200157700001300169700001100182700001000193700001300203700001300216700001200229245006900241856008600310300000800396490000700404520251900411022001402930 2018 d10aNeglected tropical diseases (NTDs)10aLymphatic filariasis (LF)10aElimination10aSierra Leone1 aKoroma J1 aSesay S1 aConteh A1 aPaye J1 aBah M1 aSonnie M1 aHodges M1 aZhang Y00aProgress on elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Sierra Leone. uhttps://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13071-018-2915-4 a3340 v113 a

BACKGROUND: A baseline survey in 2007-2008 found lymphatic filariasis (LF) to be endemic in Sierra Leone in all 14 districts and co-endemic with onchocerciasis in 12 districts. Mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin started in 2006 for onchocerciasis and was modified to add albendazole in 2008 to include LF treatment. In 2011, after three effective MDAs, a significant reduction in microfilaraemia (mf) prevalence and density was reported at the midterm assessment. After five MDAs, in 2013, mf prevalence and density were again measured as part of a pre-transmission assessment survey (pre-TAS) conducted per WHO guidelines.

METHODS: For the pre-TAS survey, districts were paired to represent populations of one million for impact assessment. One sentinel site selected from baseline and one spot check site purposefully selected based upon local knowledge of patients with LF were surveyed per pair (two districts). At each site, 300 people over five years of age provided mid-night blood samples and mf prevalence and density were determined using thick blood film microscopy. Results are compared with baseline and midterm data.

RESULTS: At pre-TAS the overall mf prevalence was 0.54% (95% CI: 0.36-0.81%), compared to 0.30% (95% CI: 0.19-0.47) at midterm and 2.6% (95% CI: 2.3-3.0%) at baseline. There was a higher, but non-significant, mf prevalence among males vs females. Eight districts (four pairs) had a prevalence of mf < 1% at all sites. Two pairs (four districts) had a prevalence of mf > 1% at one of the two sites: Koinadugu 0.98% (95% CI: 0.34-2.85%) and Bombali 2.67% (95% CI: 1.41-5.00%), and Kailahun 1.56% (95% CI: 0.72-3.36%) and Kenema 0% (95% CI: 0.00-1.21%).

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to baseline, there was a significant reduction of LF mf prevalence and density in the 12 districts co-endemic for LF and onchocerciasis after five annual LF MDAs. No statistically significant difference was seen in either measure compared to midterm. Eight of the 12 districts qualified for TAS. The other four districts that failed to qualify for TAS had historically high LF baseline prevalence and density and had regular cross-border movement of populations. These four districts needed to conduct two additional rounds of LF MDA before repeating the pre-TAS. The results showed that Sierra Leone continued to make progress towards the elimination of LF as a public health problem.

 a1756-3305