02680nas a2200217   4500000000100000008004100001260001000042653002400052653001600076653001800092653001800110100002200128700001500150700001100165700001500176700001300191700001700204245013100221520208500352022002502437       2021                            d  bWiley10aInfectious Diseases10aDermatology10aSocial Stigma10aSkin Diseases1 aLuck‐Sikorski C1 aRoßmann P1 aTopp J1 aAugustin M1 aSommer R1 aWeinberger N00aAssessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: A systematic review and evaluation of patient reported outcome measures3 a<p>Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread and patients often face discrimination and stigmatisation due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatisation in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times, resulting in a wide variety of assessment measures. This study aimed at aggregating and evaluating evidence of psychometric properties and methodological quality of published measures to assess stigma in visible skin diseases.</p>

<p>Studies assessing stigmatization in visible skin diseases were searched in four databases (medline, PsyInfo, Web of Science, Embase) until February 2021. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Papers regarding development and/or validation of measures were identified by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (i) quantitative studies in (ii) populations with skin diseases using (iii) questionnaires explicitly assessing (iv) perceived or public stigmatization or discrimination available in (iv) English or German language. The Consensus-based Standards of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate their psychometric properties and risk of bias.</p>

<p>35 studies using 22 instruments were identified. Twenty instruments focused on assessing the perceived reality of those affected by visible skin diseases, while public stigma was only assessed by two instruments. Twelve scales could be recommended for use, while ten instruments had the potential to be recommended after further studies have assessed their quality.</p>

<p>Some limitations are to be noted. Only studies in English and German were included. Research on self-constructed instruments can lead to new validated instruments but were not included in the review at this point.</p>

<p>Several validated instruments could be recommended for use. Future research is needed regarding assessment of stigma across different visible skin diseases, in children and adolescents, and in the general public.</p>
  a0926-9959, 1468-3083