02677nas a2200253   4500000000100000008004100001260003700042100001100079700001300090700001200103700001400115700001500129700001700144700001300161700001200174700001400186700001900200245007500219856010900294300001300403490000600416520198700422022001402409       2022                            d  bPublic Library of Science (PLoS)1 aPant I1 aKhosla S1 aLama JT1 aShanker V1 aAlKhaldi M1 aEl-Basuoni A1 aMichel B1 aBitar K1 aNsofor IM1 aNazif-Munoz JI00aDecolonising global health evaluation: Synthesis from a scoping review  uhttps://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000306&type=printable  ae00003060 v23 a<p>As decolonisation awareness and activism amplifies in the mainstream masses and within academic realms across a variety of fields, the time is right to converge parallel movements to decolonise the fields of global health and evaluation by restructuring relations of dependency and domination reified through the “foreign gaze”1 or “white gaze.” We conducted a review of relevant records with the following inclusion criteria–they define or advocate for the decolonisation of global health evaluation or explicate methods, policies or interventions to decolonise global health evaluation published by advocates of the decolonisation movement from both fields. These records were derived following a systematic article search by the lead autthor on Google, Google Scholar, NewsBank, and PubMed using the following keywords: “decolonising” and “global health,” “evaluation,” or “global health evaluation” replicating a digital search strategy utilized by scoping reviews across a variety of topics. Because the topic of interest is nascent and still emerging, the date range was not restricted. The lead author screened abstracts retrieved from the search. In total, 57 records, ranging in publication date from 1994 to 2020, were selected and charted for this review. We reviewed these records to identify socio-ecological factors that influence the decolonisation of global health evaluation, such as decolonising minds; reorienting funders and reforming funding mechanisms; and investing in sustainable capacity exchange. In doing so, we reflected on our positionality as well as our internalisation and potential reinforcement of colonial relations in the process of reporting our results. In the context of turmoil and transition due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our scoping review offers a starting point to embark on a journey first to transform and decolonise global health evaluation and then to achieve the greater goal of equity and justice.</p>
  a2767-3375