03452nas a2200277 4500000000100000008004100001260004400042653001800086653001800104653001600122653003900138653003400177653003200211100001100243700001500254700001200269700001300281700001300294700001500307245013600322856011500458300000900573490000700582520257100589022001403160 2023 d bSpringer Science and Business Media LLC10aHealth Policy10aHealth equity10aIntegration10aNeglected tropical diseases (NTDs)10aPeople centred health systems10aPolicy and programme reform1 aDean L1 aTolhurst R1 aNallo G1 aKollie K1 aBettee A1 aTheobald S00aA health-systems journey towards more people-centred care: lessons from neglected tropical disease programme integration in Liberia uhttps://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12961-023-00975-x.pdf?pdf=button%20sticky a1-130 v213 a

Background: Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are associated with high levels of morbidity and disability as a result of stigma and social exclusion. To date, the management of NTDs has been largely biomedical. Consequently, ongoing policy and programme reform within the NTD community is demanding the development of more holistic disease management, disability and inclusion (DMDI) approaches. Simultaneously, integrated, people-centred health systems are increasingly viewed as essential to ensure the efficient, effective and sustainable attainment of Universal Health Coverage. Currently, there has been minimal consideration of the extent to which the development of holistic DMDI strategies are aligned to and can support the development of people-centred health systems. The Liberian NTD programme is at the forefront of trying to establish a more integrated, person-centred approach to the management of NTDs and provides a unique learning site for health systems decision makers to consider how shifts in vertical programme delivery can support overarching systems strengthening efforts that are designed to promote the attainment of health equity.

Methods: We use a qualitative case study approach to explore how policy and programme reform of the NTD programme in Liberia supports systems change to enable the development of integrated people-centred services.

Results: A cumulation of factors, catalysed by the shock to the health system presented by the Ebola epidemic, created a window of opportunity for policy change. However, programmatic change aimed at achieving person-centred practice was more challenging. Deep reliance on donor funding for health service delivery in Liberia limits the availability of flexible funding, and the ongoing funding prioritization towards specific disease conditions limits flexibility in health systems design that can shape more person-centred care.

Conclusion: Sheikh et al.’s four key aspects of people centred health systems, that is, (1) putting peoples voices and needs first; (2) people centredness in service delivery; (3) relationships matter: health systems as social institutions; and (4) values drive people centred health systems, enable the illumination of varying push and pull factors that can facilitate or hinder the alignment of DMDI interventions with the development of people-centred health systems to support disease programme integration and the attainment of health equity.

 a1478-4505