02509nas a2200301 4500000000100000008004100001260003400042653005700076653002100133653001600154653001400170653001800184653002600202653001100228100001400239700001700253700001300270700000900283700001800292700001700310700001400327700001700341245011400358856010800472300000900580520159300589022002502182 2023 d bOxford University Press (OUP)10aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health10aGeneral Medicine10aCo-creation10aCo-design10aco-production10aTheoretical framework10aTheory1 aMessiha K1 aChinapaw MJM1 aKet HCFF1 aAn Q1 aAnand-Kumar V1 aLongworth GR1 aChastin S1 aAltenburg TM00aSystematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health uhttps://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046/50251640/fdad046.pdf a1-153 a

Background: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research.

Methods: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed.

Results: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating.

Conclusion: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.

 a1741-3842, 1741-3850