TY - JOUR KW - Vaccines KW - User-centred research KW - Student education KW - Risk–benefit KW - Precision medicine KW - Patient voice KW - Patient empowerment KW - Patient Advocacy KW - Outcomes research KW - Cultural competency AU - Holt D AU - Bouder F AU - Elemuwa C AU - Gaedicke G AU - Khamesipour A AU - Kisler B AU - Kochhar S AU - Kutalek R AU - Maurer W AU - Obermeier P AU - Seeber L AU - Trusko B AU - Gould S AU - Rath B AB -

Much has been written about the patient-physician relationship over the years. This relationship is essential in maintaining trust in the complex arena of modern diagnostic techniques, treatment and prevention, including vaccines and vaccine safety. However, a great deal of this material was written from the viewpoint of clinicians and academics. The patient voice may be positive or negative, fragmented or complex. Information sources are weighed and treated differently, according to the value system and risk perceptions of the individual. In post-trust societies, when people have less confidence in health authorities, communication needs to be more than a paternalistic top-down process. Notions of empowerment and individual patient choice are becoming crucial in medical care. The 'voice of the patient', which includes healthy individuals receiving vaccines, needs to be heard, considered and addressed. With respect to childhood immunizations, this will be the voice of the parent or caregiver. The key to addressing any concerns could be to listen more and to develop a communication style that is trust-based and science-informed. Regulatory agencies are encouraging clinical and patient-reported outcomes research under the umbrella of personalized medicine, and this is an important step forward. This paper attempts to reflect the paradigm shift towards increasing attention to the patient voice in vaccination and vaccine safety.

BT - Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases C1 -

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27939015?dopt=Abstract

J2 - Clin. Microbiol. Infect. LA - eng N2 -

Much has been written about the patient-physician relationship over the years. This relationship is essential in maintaining trust in the complex arena of modern diagnostic techniques, treatment and prevention, including vaccines and vaccine safety. However, a great deal of this material was written from the viewpoint of clinicians and academics. The patient voice may be positive or negative, fragmented or complex. Information sources are weighed and treated differently, according to the value system and risk perceptions of the individual. In post-trust societies, when people have less confidence in health authorities, communication needs to be more than a paternalistic top-down process. Notions of empowerment and individual patient choice are becoming crucial in medical care. The 'voice of the patient', which includes healthy individuals receiving vaccines, needs to be heard, considered and addressed. With respect to childhood immunizations, this will be the voice of the parent or caregiver. The key to addressing any concerns could be to listen more and to develop a communication style that is trust-based and science-informed. Regulatory agencies are encouraging clinical and patient-reported outcomes research under the umbrella of personalized medicine, and this is an important step forward. This paper attempts to reflect the paradigm shift towards increasing attention to the patient voice in vaccination and vaccine safety.

PY - 2016 T2 - Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases TI - The importance of the patient voice in vaccination and vaccine safety-are we listening? SN - 1469-0691 ER -