Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Printer-friendly version
TitlePoverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
Publication TypeJournal Article
AuthorsBanks LM, Kuper H, Polack S
Abbrev. JournalPLoS ONE
JournalPloS one
Year of Publication2017
Volume12
Issue12
Paginatione0189996
Publication Languageeng
KeywordsBrazil, China, Disability, India, Low- and middle-income countries, Poverty, Systematic review
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Disability and poverty are believed to operate in a cycle, with each reinforcing the other. While agreement on the existence of a link is strong, robust empirical evidence substantiating and describing this potential association is lacking. Consequently, a systematic review was undertaken to explore the relationship between disability and economic poverty, with a focus on the situation in low and middle income countries (LMICs).

METHODS: Ten electronic databases were searched to retrieve studies of any epidemiological design, published between 1990-March 2016 with data comparing the level of poverty between people with and without disabilities in LMICs (World Bank classifications). Poverty was defined using economic measures (e.g. assets, income), while disability included both broad assessments (e.g. self-reported functional or activity limitations) and specific impairments/disorders. Data extracted included: measures of association between disability and poverty, population characteristics and study characteristics. Proportions of studies finding positive, negative, null or mixed associations between poverty and disability were then disaggregated by population and study characteristics.

RESULTS: From the 15,500 records retrieved and screened, 150 studies were included in the final sample. Almost half of included studies were conducted in China, India or Brazil (n = 70, 47%). Most studies were cross-sectional in design (n = 124, 83%), focussed on specific impairment types (n = 115, 77%) and used income as the measure for economic poverty (n = 82, 55%). 122 studies (81%) found evidence of a positive association between disability and a poverty marker. This relationship persisted when results were disaggregated by gender, measure of poverty used and impairment types. By country income group at the time of data collection, the proportion of country-level analyses with a positive association increased with the rising income level, with 59% of low-income, 67% of lower-middle and 72% of upper-middle income countries finding a positive relationship. By age group, the proportion of studies reporting a positive association between disability and poverty was lowest for older adults and highest for working-age adults (69% vs. 86%).

CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence for a link between disability and poverty in LMICs and an urgent need for further research and programmatic/policy action to break the cycle.

PubMed URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29267388?dopt=Abstract

DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0189996
Link to full texthttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189996&type=printable

More resources on: